-
Butler, B. (2011, forthcoming). Capital pretrial publicity as a symbolic public execution: A case report. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 11(3), xx-xx.
-
Butler, B. (2010). How to think like a shrink: Using psychological concepts to enhance voir dire. Florida Defender, 22(4), 12-14.
-
Butler, B. (2010). Moving beyond Ford, Atkins, and Roper: Jurors’ attitudes toward the execution of the elderly and the physically disabled. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 16(8), 631-647.
-
Butler, B. (2010). My client is guilty of “this,” but not guilty of “that:” The impact of defense-attorney concessions on juror decisions. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 28(1), 5-19.
-
Butler, B. (2010). “He’s something less than human:” The impact of pretrial publicity on capital defendants’ right to due process. Florida Defender, 21(4), 19-24.
-
Butler, B. (2008). Caveats of the death-qualified jury: Ways capital defense attorneys can use psycholegal research to their advantage. The Jury Expert, 20(1), 10-22.
-
Butler, B. (2008). The role of death qualification in venirepersons' susceptibility to victim impact statements. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 14(2), 133-141.
-
Butler, B. (2007). Death qualification and prejudice: The effect of implicit racism, sexism, and homophobia on capital defendants' right to due process. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25(6), 857-867.
-
Butler, B. (2007). The role of death qualification in capital trials involving juvenile defendants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(3), 549-560.
-
Butler, B. (2007). The role of death qualification in jurors' susceptibility to pretrial publicity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(1), 115-123.
-
Butler, B. (2006). Jurors' attitudes toward post-sentence civil commitment. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 24(2), 21-30.
-
Butler, B. (2006). NGRI revisited: Venirepersons' attitudes toward the insanity defense. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(8), 1833-1847.
-
Butler, B., & Moran, G. (2009). Is “more” mitigation “better?” A comparison of the additive and averaging models in capital cases. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 27(1), 57-70.
-
Butler, B., & Moran, G. (2007). The impact of death qualification, belief in a just world, legal authoritarianism, and locus of control on venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25(1), 57-68.
-
Butler, B., & Moran, G. (2007). The role of death qualification and need for cognition in venirepersons' evaluations of expert scientific testimony in capital trials. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25(4), 561-571.
-
Butler, B., & Moran, G. (2002). The role of death qualification in venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials. Law and Human Behavior, 26(2), 175-184.
-
Butler, B., & Wasserman, A. W. (2006). The role of death qualification in venirepersons' attitudes toward the insanity defense. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(7), 1744-1757.